Half of children’s brain tumors have the SV-40 virus

“It’s estimated that a third of the population [of the United States] contains one very potent cancer virus that came in through the polio vaccines—the SV-40 virus. That’s just one shining example of one that was inadvertently picked many years ago. And it took 30 years for the medical community to embrace this fact, and speak of it in the literature, and so it’s in mainstream literature that you can find that this SV-40 virus, which came through the polio vaccines, is indeed in many people and does cause tumors, causes brain tumors, mesotheliomas… or I should say is heavily associated, in many cases, to have this virus in the tumor while the surrounding tissue is free of virus. Children’s brain tumors, 40-60% of them contain the SV-40 virus.”

— Dr. Suzanne Humphries, nephrologist and internist

64 thoughts on “Half of children’s brain tumors have the SV-40 virus”

  2. Heavily associated….in many cases to have the virus?
    A fish is heavily associated with water and in many cases has fins but does not cause rain!
    Where is the cause/effect proof? Half of children who develop cancer are female?
    Vaccines have wiped out polio….make your own conclusion

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. But out of the 8 that my generation got we are now up to 36 different vaccines. Ever look up at the sky when there is no plane but the jet stream is still there. You think that is just blowing smoke up your???

      Liked by 3 people

      Reply

    3. Your comment shows how little you understand about science, They will almost never say something outright CAUSES cancer. They sort of beat around the bush. Just like they claim vaccines don’t “cause” autism. Yet there have been tons paid to parents for their children getting autism from vaccines. They will claim it was a contributing factor, or is “heavily associated”. You know not everyone who smokes gets lung cancer so many can argue it doesn’t cause cancer and they did for years… and scientist, the tobacco industry, etc manipulated that data for decades, lied to everyone to make more money… until the truth just couldn’t be buried. But it is accepted and known now right. Yet smoking is still legal… why? Well BIG TOBACCO has allot of money and buys off politicians. Alcohol and Tobacco kill by far more people then all other illnesses… yet it is ok to drink and smoke, because of the money made and politicians bought. Pharmaceutical companies are the same way. They kill thousands, and damage millions and go unchecked and with no liability or accountable. No studies on the ingredients in vaccines if they are safe individually. No testing to ensure they are safe as a vaccine, and absolutely no safety testing to ensure the schedule of currently 74 vaccines in childhood are safe to give children.
      Then not only that did you know that vaccines are tested to actually work? Yes this is true. They only test to see if there is an anti-body, which is a joke as even that “test” has been riddled with fraud. Other studies have proven the development of a anti-body doesn’t mean you have any immunity to the disease. But they NEVER actually test the anti-body for efficiency.
      Then if that wasn’t bad enough they put known neurotoxins in… like thimerosal. Which of course they recommend you get the flu shot EVER year. Did you know that the half life of thimerosal is 20 years? {If you don’t know what half life is, well you shouldn’t even be engaging in this discussion at all} So even if the flu vaccine worked at all (which it doesn’t and there is no real proof it does and tons that it kills and damaged hundreds, just look at the VAERS report) it is toxic to take every year per the CDC, FDA’s own guidelines.
      The fact that you think Polio dropped due to the vaccine actually shows how little you know about polio and the drop in the disease and when the vaccine was introduced.
      Also do you know that doctors are not actually trained or taught how to proper handle a vaccine reaction or injury. Or for that matter a reaction to a pharmaceutical reaction. They just change protocol. They don’t report your issues or side effects and even when a child dies hours after their vaccines that was previously healthy, they typically tell the parents that there is no way the vaccines caused the death.
      Really do your homework before you come here spewing the brain washing that you have heard, without doing any of your own research. It makes you sound like a brainless “sheeple”.

      Liked by 11 people

      Reply

      1. And the pharmaceutical Co give Dr. free trips to any place they want to go in the world for testing that stuff on are kids with no idea on the long term effect!

        Like

      6. Good information and you are 100% right. Sadly most to relieve we have been brainwashed to believe everything is tested. I challenge anyone to read one FDA study just one where you will never see things such as shown safe, no side effects, continued study, on vaccines you will never see blind study, long study let alone enough time to see long effects. Here’s what I find funny even on your example sugar substitutes “should be safe for human consumption” 😳 people need to actually do real research and not this brainwashed stuff they replicate as thru are intelligent on the issue 🤨 heaven help us all they are poisoning us in every direction for simple PROFIT

        Like

      7. Wow. This is a really uninformed comment disguised with medical jargon. 1) do you even know what VAERS is? It’s a reporting company which means every panicked parent who says “OH NO MY BABY HAS A 99.0 FEVER ITS THE END OF THE WORD” gets the same stake as every kid that has some kind of allergic reaction. ALSO they arent responsible for any kind of testing to see if the vaccine is actually responsible or if something else is at play (though you seem to be the kind if person that wouldnt believe evidence in the first place) 2) there are only 36 shots recommended (and they arent even all “mandatory” like for school and stuff, though it’s far too easy to get around these barriers to but your child in danger) this is a high number, yes, but about half of what you suggested and this is including all 2nd 3rd and 4th doses of the same thing as a child grows. 3) thimerosal. Okay really? Ik tired of this “THIMEROSAL CONTAINS MERCURY WAH WAH WAH” garbage. Thimerisol contains an ingredient called “ethylmercury.” It is over 50% mercury by weight. However. The dangerous one (the one you get from seafood btw) is methyl mercury. “But mercury is still murcury!!!” You might retort. Actually no. Sodium and chlorine are two of the most dangerous elements on their own. Quite explosive. But together? Table salt. The same is true for a lot of compounds. Methyl mercury is constructed in a way that allows it to be reactive in the human body; ethylmercury, not the same story. Dont tell people to “research for themselves ‘sheeple’ ” and then allow yourself to be blinded by fear. Thsi is just rediculous.

        Like

    5. In Jan 1997, the first International scientific workshop on sv40, sponsered jointly by US Govts major health agencies was held in Washington. Over 100 scientists attended as did senior representatives of UKs Dept. of Health and film producers commissioned by Channel 4s Dispatches tv programme (UK) According to scientists at the conference sv40 is now endemic in the human population. It has been found in brain tumours in children not exposed to the contaminated vaccine, and the best theory is that it was passed from mother to children. Prof. Mauro Tognon, Verona, Italy reported having found in sv40 in 8 out of 20 samples of ‘healthy’ human semen.(copies of tv report can be obtained DISPATCHES: POLIO VACCINE, PO BOX 4000, London W12 8UF)

      Liked by 4 people

      Reply

      1. There’s also evidence that SV-40 may still be in the polio vaccine. Children with known SV-40 tumours sometimes have parents who do *not* carry SV-40 and whose cord blood did *not* have any sign of SV-40. So, how did they get it then?

        Is anyone even checking that there is no SV-40 in current polio vaccines?

        Liked by 1 person

    7. Correlation is not causation. This is definitely true and important to consider.

      However, consider: if 50% of the people that leave a certain company ended up dead within a month. Or: If 50 percent of people wearing black shirts attack people with knives when in range. Would you want to know about these correlations, or do you think it should be kept hidden until more research was done? Would you change the way you approached a person with a black shirt if it was reported?

      This said, when something is correlation I think showing how this data might be misleading is critical to help reduce over reaction.

      There is already enough false info on both sides of the Vaccine debate. My personal opinion is that most are great, most have minor issues, and some are found out to have major ones. But for most there is more good than harm done. That said there is a lot of corruption and there is an extreme focus on money over societal benefits and too much influence of business over government.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. Only in populations where they are vaccinated.

        Dr Salk (developed the polio vaccine) testified before congress in the early 1960’s that his creation was a failure, and admitted then that the only people getting polio were those getting his vaccine. Why have people buried his testimony? Who is being paid off or silenced?

        Liked by 6 people

    9. If you think the polio vaccine wiped out polio you are sadly mistaken. It is fact that polio was on a significant downward Trend prior to the introduction of the vaccine. Secondly the government changed how polio was classified which had a significant impact and an immediate decrease in the number of polio cases based on the criteria that had been changed. This is fact and can be easily verified

      Liked by 6 people

      Reply

    11. The last known cases of polio and measles are from the vaccinations, end of story. The ability and abundance of healthy food and sanitation is what helped get rid of those diseases. If vaccinations work than why are the vaccinated spreading the diseases? If vaccinations work then my unvaccinated child should not be of any concern. My child is unvaccinated, and has never been sick.

      Liked by 3 people

      Reply

      1. I have four children. My oldest son suffered a severe brain injury from his DTP/Polio vaccine at four months old. He has a severe seizure disorder as a result. Seizures daily. He has never walked or talked. My other three children have never had a vaccine. They are all very healthy adults. They never had an ear infection, rarely ever sick, no asthma, no ADD, no ADHD…no autism….perfectly healthy children and educated successful adults. I ask everyone to do your own home work….get educated….be informed and then make your decision.,

        Liked by 7 people

    13. Really have a look in the history of polio pls and if you there look for the 2500 cases of polio who were cured without medicine or vaccines sister Kenny

      Liked by 3 people

      Reply

    14. Check CDC’s website, people can have Polio without any symptoms, everyone always talks about Polio, well they make many different vaccines that people weren’t getting just 30 years ago, Chicken Pox never killed anyone and by getting it, it prevents cancer later on in life, and now kids are getting shingles and cancer and so on. It’s not hard to see that kids are messed up now and adults too, open your eyes.

      Liked by 3 people

      Reply

    16. do some research before you talk so arrogantly…you need a building to fall on you to see the problem …where do you think it came from if it was found in the vaccine and the monkey tissue the virus was grown on????..geez wake up

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

    17. You need to do some research on the background of the polio vaccine! You will be surprised. Polio was 95% eradicated on its own before the vaccine was implemented and later caused the spread of polio cause but then they gave stuff a different name to protect vaccine companies….better do some research on this

      Liked by 3 people

      Reply

    18. Better do some research on that polio eradication cos you havent got the whole story by a long shot just the propaganda lies do your homework and dont rely on govt agencies since they are in bed with big pHarma…like CDC mayb you should watch VAXXED online streaming

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. The last 22 years there have been no polio cases in the Netherlands thanks to the vaccination program.Before that there were a few in the biblebelt,before 1957 there were a lot,before the vaccinations.I used to live in a town that was very black-stockinged,and have seen many children contract polio,they were paralysed or died.Not anymore,thanks to vaccins.

        Like

    22. Heavily associated referred to percentage. The fact that SV-40 found in the tumor IN is association … they can’t use cause or it wld be 100% . You might fammiliarize your self with science research papers. How they have to state things. Read some.on nih website. Or sthu.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

    23. When you say vaccines have wiped out polio are you referring to the polio caused by the government program of de-lousing kids with ddt, the polio that was supposedly wiped out by the old polio vaccine they phased out because it was hurting too many people, or the polio over in Africa that’s (according to the CDC) being spread by the newer polio vaccine?

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

    24. If your going to try and compare two scenarios you should try to make them relevant to one another to actually make a point, you’re comparing fish and water to a infected green monkey cells that ended up contaminating hundreds of thousands of vaccines which then ended up in people and creating health problems such as cancer, tumours etc. I think it’s important to critically think if a vaccine is creating cancer but yet eradicating a disease is there actually any good either way? is there not an evident flaw in this situation? YES!! So think this way and even though I actually don’t believe the polio vaccine eradicated polio in North America but I’ll entertain it but we are trading Polio for Cancer?? Why is that actually better?

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

    25. Have research studies looked at the risk of cancer in children whose mothers received SV40-contaminated polio vaccine?

      Yes, two studies concerning maternal vaccination with SV40-contaminated vaccines and risk of cancer in offspring have been conducted. Each study reported an association.

      1. Heinonen et al. (1973) reported a higher incidence of neural malignancies in children born to mothers who received inactivated poliovirus during pregnancy. The prospective study of over 50,000 women who were pregnant between 1959-1965 identified 24 malignancies in their children during the first 4 years of life. The rate of malignancy was about two-fold greater in children born to mothers immunized during pregnancy when compared with children born to unimmunized mothers or mothers who received influenza or OPV vaccines. Neural tumors accounted for most of the difference.

      2. Farwell et al. (1979) found that of 15 cases of medulloblastoma in children born in Connecticut between 1956-1962, 10 were born to mothers exposed to SV40 contaminated polio vaccine while 5 were born to mothers unexposed. Interpretation of these results, however, is hampered by the low response rates and uncertain accuracy of vaccination histories by obstetricians (Strickler et al., 1998).

      Additional studies are needed that focus on maternal vaccination with SV40-contaminated vaccines and risk of cancer and other health effects in offspring.

      Like

      Reply

    28. The name polio was changed to acute flaccid myelitis and is still common.

      SV40 is being found in brain tumors of humans.

      “Bernice Eddy (1903–1989) was an American virologist and epidemiologist. She and Sarah Elizabeth Stewart are known for their discoveries related to polyomavirus and SV40 in particular, a cancer-causing monkey virus that millions of people were exposed to through contaminated polio vaccines.”

      There is plenty of evidence to prove SV40 was in polio vaccine and that the virus is founf in tumors. You just need to look.

      Be aware also that SV40 was just one monkey virus discovered. The question is, how many other monkey viruses were in vaccines? Were there 40?

      Like

      Reply

    29. John, they’re lying to you. Here’s a little research i’ve done that i’ll share with you.
      https://jchristoff.com/20-things-you-dont-know-about-polio-2/?fbclid=IwAR0_TTU9SQ2wNIdwf5gu_vtaenSPSRnrdnNq8vx-pYdWzcsdtniuC7kWQW4

      https://humansarefree.com/2019/10/cancer-was-spread-through-millions-of-polio-vaccines-laced-with-cancer-virus-no-one-has-ever-been-held-accountable.html?lm=a708d7b8a2f48e12e4c344b4b7ff40b2&amp%3Bls1=49c6127b9881b68ed2d17c15bea242d0d4be99c9&amp%3Bls2=87f777e66c3358555777a96008bbc5b37fd04ea26371222c0ae8e328e24b107d

      Like

      Reply

  3. Hint: SV-40 was first delivered from monkeys to humans via the polio vaccine. And look where it is found today. Polio, a/k/a transverse myelitis a/k/a Guillain Barré syndrome (to name a few) has never been eradicated. We have the polio vaccine to thank for that as well. Please read “Dissolving Illusions” by Suzanne Humphries, MD. An enlightening, excellent read. Indeed, everyone, please draw your own conclusions, and, please, take the liberty to choose the direction you wish to take in your own education. True science is never established fact, it continues to evolve as more facts and data become available.

    Liked by 5 people

    Reply

    1. In 1991, I developed bilateral medial calf muscle atrophy and profound lethargy. A tired beyond tired, and it is the same today. I think the sugar cube vaccine we got as little kids did this. I think fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome are post polio syndrome, which slammed my cousin in 1991 also – he had polio as a child.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

    2. Elxroflife: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8301426

      No matter what side of whatever argument you are on. There are people that spread beliefs without any significant evidence or evidence that is later disproved. This took me two minutes to find. There are also people that state outright lies. There are lots of lies out their even by people that won’t profit, just look at the government supporters of the side you don’t support and you will see them. Oddly you will find them much harder to see on the side you do support, but people are people on both sides, so they are there.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. Thank you for joining in on the conversation. This article isn’t saying much, other then spreading beliefs without any significant evidence. But supposedly, it comes from an “official scientific” source, so in an ideology mindset we shouldn’t question it. I prefer not to take sides, and do wonder why “official science” offers little or no evidence of vaccine safety or efficacy, and why conservative pro-vaccine scientists who find evidence to the contrary, are quickly offered to change their tune, or get discredited. Once discredited no matter how pro vaccine said scientists are, they are now officially declared anti-vaccine, and “quacks”. I simply observe.

        Those who hear the sound of only one bell, will only ever hear the sound of one bell.” ~ African proverb. Believe as you wish. It’s your life, and if I support anything, I am in support of everyone living life free to be themselves, and free to make their own health care choices. Best of luck to you and your family. You’ll need it if blindly rely on official “science”.

        Like

      2. You better stand for something or you will fall for anything…thats how we got in this mess in the first place…placid acceptance of whatever the media told you… some of the biggest liars around owned by 6 corporations worldwide with deep pockets and owned largely by bi pHarma….

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Do you have a source to back this up? I’m not discounting it at all but I don’t want to spread this without some sort of outside medical confirmation. Were biopsies done? How does she come to this statistic? I write often about vaccine safety in my columns but I can’t quote something like this without some sort of references to show where the figures came from. Thanks.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. Geez…get her book..read it and check the references do some real investigative journalism…your willing to quote what mass media tells you and they are some of the biggest liars around

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

  7. I contracted polio myelitis in 1955 as a result of the vaccine.
    I underwent surgery to transplant muscles in my leg to help prevent foot drop.
    I am in fear of post polio syndrome and now cancer. Do I have any legal recourse?

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

    1. Nope …would have to prove it in vaccine court (then maybe) and they dont like to hear cases. Besides big pHarma has immunity from direct prosecution..isnt that convenient?

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

  9. I have been doing a fair amount of research on my own into this subject, as of late. I have watched multiple videos, read a lot of articles, and verified sources from many of those . I must say, there is a lot of information out there, and I had no idea that Oswald, and the Kennedy administration may even be intertwined into this mess.
    I can only hope this is all nonsense, and that my Government has not been that corrupt, that dishonest, and that evil, to knowingly administer contaminated vaccines to a large cross section of the population. Not only that, they apparently continued to administer those vaccines for a long period of time, and now the population as a whole is infected, and faces potentially fatal health problems, on an ongoing basis. There are even some claims that contaminated vaccines may have been responsible for starting the AIDS epidemic.
    I had all 4 of my children Vaccinated, like a good little sheep does, trusting my pediatrician, along with their Governmental oversight. My children range in age from 7 to 24. I lost my second born son to a malignant brain tumor at the age of five, back in 1998. I can tell you, that loss has left a hole in my heart that will never be filled, and I miss my little guy every day. I truly hope that my decision to have my children vaccinated did not contribute to the development of his tumor. There is a body of evidence out there that shows that 40%-60% of pediatric brain tumors have SV40 present within the tumor, but not found in the tissue surrounding the tumor. That is very disturbing information if true, and it shows a direct link between sv40 and cancerous tumors.
    If even a small portion of all the accusations regarding vaccines, and sv40 are true, I will not be able to trust Doctors, or the Government they answer to ever again. And we want to give Government officials more control of the health care industry, through Obamacare? With that level of corruption present in Washington, maybe Hillary Clinton will fit right in as President after all.

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

  11. No, poliomyelitis has not been ‘wiped out’. Four people died from poliomyelitis in the nineteenth century, and a few thousand in the twentieth century, with the last known death in 1991. There are three current strains, one natural, two man made, with three countries ‘know’ to have the virus.

    See here.

    https://ourworldindata.org/polio

    Like

    Reply

  12. I lean towards minimising imminisations and practicing (way) more preventative medicine, but when a scientist says ‘from 40% to 60%’ about such a huge issue it raises a red flag to me.
    Stats are malleable enough, but such a huge gap between estimates doesn’t inspire confidence in scientific integrity. To fight the powers that be using loose or hyperbolic science claims is a losing policy, imo.
    I have 3 unvaccinated children, all healthy.

    Like

    Reply

  13. Do you have the citation for this? Dr Suzanne does not usually say things without a pub med ID. Would love to have the science behind it.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment